Blog



Sherri Torjman 
From Convention to convention
New technologies unintentionally can create barriers to participation
Accessible design of technologies is essential
May 17, 2012

The disability community has long called for societal changes that promote inclusion and participation in all aspects of society. 

 

There is substantial work under way throughout the world to advance the inclusion agenda through technology.  Information and communication technologies (ICT), in particular, play a significant role. 

 

The Global Initiative for Inclusive Information and Communication Technologies (G3ict), for example, is a project of the United Nations Global Alliance for ICT and Development.  Initiated in December 2006 by the Wireless Internet Institute, G3ict is a public-private partnership dedicated to the world-wide implementation of the Digital Accessibility Agenda defined by the international Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 

 

Canada ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2010.  But there is much work to be done in getting from Convention to convention.

 

Despite the value of information and communications technologies, their wide-ranging use and adoption inadvertently can create problems at the same time.  Gary Birch of the Neil Squire Society points out that many of the new technologies coming onto the market are not inherently accessible for a large number of persons with disabilities.  These new forms of equipment unintentionally act as barriers to − rather than enablers of − participation.  

 

The Neil Squire Society convened a series of focus groups involving persons with mobility, hearing and vision impairments to learn more about the challenges they face.  There was consensus that wireless technologies had promising potential to enhance inclusion because they are not rooted in a single place and enable mobility.  But sometimes their design creates barriers that no one is articulating, let alone addressing.

 

Gary’s team at the Neil Squire Society set out to explore the problem.  They carried out a study on electronic payment, including the automated machines used in banking, buying tickets and providing information.  Electronic payment was selected as the subject of investigation due to its widespread use by industry and its emergence as a primary mode of transaction.

 

The report identifies various obstacles embedded in current technologies, including voice menu systems that do not provide sufficient time for users with mobility impairments.  Most voice menu systems do not have a text-based alternative to allow access by users with hearing impairments.  Most web-based systems do not adhere to all the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, which make these systems largely unusable by persons with vision impairments.

 

The Neil Squire Society proposes three strategic approaches to tackle the problem.  First, the non-profit sector, which has expertise on persons with disabilities and technology, must engage actively with industry to help business understand design challenges and potential solutions.  

 

Second, the disability community must be involved in formulating regulations and standards that shape the design and use of accessible technology. 

 

Finally, it is essential to ensure that postsecondary students who will be responsible for the development of new technologies, including engineers, computer scientists and industrial designers, learn the principles of inclusive design as a compulsory component of their curriculum.  

 

The design of inclusive information and communication technologies right from the get-go is a crucial step in reducing reliance on regulation and compliance.  Ideally, in future, ICT products will simply be created in a way that contributes to the solution of accessibility − rather than adds to the problem. 

 

 

Sherri Torjman

May 17, 2012

 
RSS Feed Subscribe

Name
Email (not displayed on site)
Comments
Please note that comments will not appear on the site until they have been approved by a moderator.

Anthony M
Great article. It is very true that there is still a lot of work to be done. Having the associated disabled community as a contributor throughout each part of the process, in my opinion, is the most important and potentially the most underrated. Great read.


HAVE YOU SEEN

-The Case for a Canada Social Report -Private money, public programs? There will always be strings -Ensuring the Welfare of 'Welfare Incomes' -A Flimflam Budget -The Skilled Budget -Financing Long-Term Care: More Money in the Mix -Guiding principles for social policy budgets -Proceedings of Caledon’s 20th Anniversary -As the fiscal chill thaws: social policy ideas for the medium term -Is Canada (Still) a Fiscal Union?: Michael Mendelson -Architecture of Federal Income Security in Canada: Ken Battle -Social Policy Challenges for Canada: Sherri Torjman -In Canada, the new solitudes are East vs. West -Picture - Sherri Torjman -Canada’s English-French divide giving way to East-West economic split, scholar says -Video - Sherri Torjman: Five Good Ideas about Policy -Video - Sherri Torjman: Canada@150 address -Video - Sherri Torjman: Shared Space & Community Recreation -

Video - Sherri Torjman: Five Good Ideas about Policy

Sherri Torjman at Maytree's lunch-and-learn, Toronto, 2012

More >